Blog: A Day In The Life
Contents: Blog Home | Blog Archive | Tags | Featured Posts
Tuesday, 8 September 2009
We Love The NHS
As you probably know, there's a lot of discussion about the UK's state health service - particularly with regards to the future of America's health service. It's been a recent Trending Topic on Twitter (#welovethenhs). Anyway, this prompted me to think about what I think should be freely available to anyone, regardless of how wealthy they are. Here's what I think:- Health Care
- Education
- Housing
- Access to a Library (and hence, the Internet)
- Healthy Food
- Advice (Citizen's Advice Bureau)
- Exercise (not a gym membership - just the ability to exercise in the outdoor environment - like the Chinese exercise parks)
- Public Transport (making all of the above less restricted)
There are some other things I think should be freely available to anyone, regardless of wealth, that are more extreme examples (in a perfect world), such as:
- Public Transport (all over the UK)
- A home telephone line (and calls to anywhere)
- A home internet connection
- Sufficient heating at home
I'm not saying that there shouldn't be any incentive for anyone to work - because if everyone has all these things anyway they might not feel the need to go out and earn a living, but there are plenty of things which would still be a luxury. If someone is unemployed, they have no income and more pressure is placed upon them - if they can't afford to pay their telephone line rental this will hinder their chances of getting employed (as they won't be able to ring anyone or have them ring them), and why should their state of health be affected by unemployment? It just pushes them further away from the ones living in luxury. I think as long as a person lives within the law and works to earn a living (or makes the effort to find work), there are certain things they should be entitled to.
I feel the opposite about convicted criminals - they should not have any luxuries like Sky TV but their health should not be affected. They should have the ability to eat healthily and exercise but not live in comfort and luxury - why should a convicted criminal be better off than a hard working man on minimum wage?
Labels: Miscellaneous
Posted by Ben Nuttall at 13:04 ![]()